W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > September 2012

Re: XML Core WG Status and Open Actions as of 2012 September 10

From: Innovimax W3C <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 23:19:33 +0200
Message-ID: <CAAK2GfGkxhHc7GJ2aTLaa9cXPGEi3byOY1SxB_k8_JyXz+uuxw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Grosso <paul@paulgrosso.name>
Cc: core <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
Paul,

Can you double check that I'm still not nominated ?

Thanks

Mohamed

On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Paul Grosso <paul@paulgrosso.name> wrote:

>
> The XML Core WG telcons are every other week.
>
> Our next telcon will be September 19.  Norm sends regrets.
>
>
> Status and open actions
> =======================
>
> Charter renewal, need to rejoin
> -------------------------------
> The new XML Core WG charter has been approved:
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2012JulSep/0033
>
> The call for participation has gone out and all WG members must
> have their AC rep rejoin the WG per
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2012JulSep/0034
>
> The following membership issues appear (to me, I could be wrong)
> outstanding:
>
> 1.  IBM has not yet rejoined.
> 2.  Innovimax has rejoined but not nominated anyone.
> 3.  MarkLogic has rejoined but not nominated anyone.
> 4.  Red Hat has rejoined but not nominated anyone.
>
>
> When I go to the page that is supposed to be the XML Core data base at
> https://www.w3.org/2000/09/dbwg/details?group=18796
> there are clearly a lot of people who are not really members, so
> ones appearance on this page proves nothing.
>
> ACTIONs to Liam:  (1) Clear out all the entries from
> https://www.w3.org/2000/09/dbwg/details?group=18796
> except the nine of us listed at
> https://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#membership.
> (2) Let us know which of the nine organizations still
> need to rejoin the working group.  (3) Let us know which
> of the nine organization still need to nominate a person.
>
>
> Error Recovery Note
> -------------------
> Liam raised an issue about a note about error recovery at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2012Sep/0002
>
> Neither Paul nor Norm thought creating such a note was
> going to be particularly useful, and Paul wondered why
> the XML Core WG should write a note about something that
> is not XML, but we decided we would pick this up when
> Liam and others can be on the call.
>
>
> Fall TPAC
> ---------
> There will be a TPAC meeting in Lyon, France in October/November:
> http://www.w3.org/2012/10/TPAC/Overview.html<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2012Mar/0006>
>
> We have signed up to have a WG f2f there.
>
> Likely to attend:  Norm, Liam, Henry, Jirka, Mohamed
> Not likely to attend:  Glenn, Paul, John, Daniel
>
>
> xml-stylesheet and HTML5
> ------------------------
> Hnery took an action to file a bug about xml-stylesheet
> handling.  Done:
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14689
>
> Henry has done a lot more testing and filing of results to date.
> Henry's tests are at
> http://www.w3.org/XML/2011/11/ssTests/
> You need to look at the README and README2 files there.
>
> The CSS2 spec says something about styling XML with CSS.
> Henry also notes http://www.w3.org/Style/styling-XML.en.html.
>
> Henry has filed bugs against the HTML5 spec saying that
> it should support styling XML with CSS.  Currently, there are:
>
> [Bug 17976] New: xml-stylesheet with type=text/xsl needs to be handled
> explicitly
> and
> [Bug 14689] xml-stylesheet with type=text/xsl needs to be handled
> explicitly
>
> A lot of bugzilla email has been exchanged on this issue.
> It looks like we have agreement to address it, but only
> in HTML.next.
>
>
> XInclude 1.1
> ------------
> On 2012 February 14, we published
> XInclude 1.1 Requirement and Use Cases
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xinclude-11-requirements/
>
> Norm created a first draft XInclude 1.1 which is at
> http://www.w3.org/XML/2012/08/xinclude-11/diff.html
>
> Paul, Norm, Jirka, and John have reviewed and have no
> comments (other than the items listed "TO DO").
>
> ACTION to Henry, Glenn, Daniel, Mohamed, Liam:  Review
> and comment on the XInclude 1.1 draft.
>
> Paul thinks we should publish an FPWD for XInclude 1.1
> by mid-October so that it will have been out before TPAC.
> That gives us Sept 19 and Oct 3 telcons, and it would be
> best to be able to approve the FPWD for publication on
> our Oct 3 telcon so that I can request publication around
> October 9.
>
> Note that the XInclude errata at
> http://www.w3.org/XML/2006/11/xinclude-errata/
> lists one simple erratum that we will want to incorporate
> into XInclude 1.1.
>
> ACTION to Norm:  Add some examples, change “resource error”
> to “recoverable error”, implement the above mentioned
> erratum, and make a general sanity check pass on the
> XInclude 1.1 draft.
>
> ACTION to Paul:  Propose SOTD wording for a FPWD.
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Monday, 10 September 2012 21:20:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:44 UTC