W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > October 2011

Re: TPAC topic: Errata in XML 1.0

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 21:29:44 -0700
To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <m27h3lpyvb.fsf@nwalsh.com> 
"Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com> writes:
> Did we ever say or imply that the productions in the spec
> were non-ambiguous?  Is the right response to these issues
> simply that we never said the productions were non-ambiguous,
> and if a parser writer wants or needs to translate them into
> equivalent non-ambiguous versions, that's fine, but there is
> nothing wrong with the productions in the spec?

I think that's probably the right response.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh
Lead Engineer
MarkLogic Corporation
Phone: +1 413 624 6676
www.marklogic.com
Received on Monday, 31 October 2011 04:30:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 31 October 2011 04:30:32 GMT