- From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:33:18 -0500
- To: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
- Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Jirka Kosek scripsit: > Paul, what is the best way to deal with this? Can be WG Note changed in > place or is it necessary to use separate errata document? If the later > is the case, we might wait few months till ISO adoption of xml-model > ends and then republish corrected WG Note with pointer to ISO standard. Notes are not really under W3C change control; we can publish a new one at any time. Probably the right thing is not to update the note's date/version, but just to add "Edited in place yyyy-mm-dd" as some W3C documents have done. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org Uneasy lies the head that wears the Editor's hat! --Eddie Foirbeis Climo
Received on Thursday, 17 February 2011 21:33:45 UTC