W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > February 2011

RE: Errata in xml-model note

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:32:14 -0500
Message-ID: <9B2DE9094C827E44988F5ADAA6A2C5DA02247AF4@HQ-MAIL9.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jirka Kosek
> Sent: Thursday, 2011 February 17 15:25
> To: John Cowan
> Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Errata in xml-model note
> John Cowan wrote:
> > In section 3 under "type", for "stylesheet" read "schema".
> Thanks for reporting.
> Paul, what is the best way to deal with this? Can be WG Note changed in
> place or is it necessary to use separate errata document? If the later
> is the case, we might wait few months till ISO adoption of xml-model
> ends and then republish corrected WG Note with pointer to ISO standard.

We can always republish a WG Note, but I don't think we need
to be in a big hurry here.  We plan to republish it anyway
when the ISO version becomes a standard, and we can be sure
to correct it then.

So the more important question for now is the ISO process.
Can you just submit a comment about this "typo" and have it
corrected in the final version without starting over the review
and voting process?


Received on Thursday, 17 February 2011 21:32:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:42 UTC