W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > April 2011

XML Core WG Status and Open Actions as of 2011 April 11

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 12:40:55 -0400
Message-ID: <9B2DE9094C827E44988F5ADAA6A2C5DA028A0217@HQ-MAIL9.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>

The XML Core WG telcons are every other week.

Our next telcon will be 2011 April 20.  


Status and open actions
=======================

TPAC week
---------
TPAC will be 31 October through 4 November 2011 in Santa Clara
California.  I think we should plan to have a f2f during this
week: http://www.w3.org/2011/11/TPAC/ - Meeting Overview page.

Likely attendance:

Probably will:  Paul, Norm, Henry, Liam
Maybe:  Mohamed
Most likely won't:  John, Daniel, Jirka, Glenn


XML Processor Profiles review
-----------------------------
There is a substantially reworked XML Processing Model WG's
Last Call Working Draft of "XML processor profiles" at
http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/xml-proc-profiles.html

John and Glenn re-reviewed the latest version
of the XML processor profiles last call draft at
http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/xml-proc-profiles.html
and had a variety of comments at the last telcon.

***ACTION to John, Glenn:  Send your comments on the latest 
version of the XML processor profiles last call draft at
http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/xml-proc-profiles.html
to the Processing Model comments list at
public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org


Name-escaping spec
------------------
Henry sent email at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2011Mar/0018
asking if we should consider producing a WG Note recommending 
an escaping scheme for turning (mostly) arbitrary strings into
XML names as a Best Practice.


LEIRIs and new editions
-----------------------
Paul sent email at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2011Mar/0007
asking for clarification of just we are planning to do in
terms of issuing new editions wrt LEIRIs. 

Paul's latest assumption is that we would have the new editions
point to our WG Note which already says:

 When [IRIbis is published as an RFC], this specification will be
 re-issued to reference it in place of the extracts given below.

We are concerned that the XML specs would be normatively referencing
an RFC through a (non-normative) WG Note, so we're not sure what we
want to do here.

***ACTION to Henry:  Ping Larry Masinter (one of the authors of
IRIbis) for the latest on the IRIbis schedule.

XML 1.0 6th Edition and XML 1.1 3rd Edition
-------------------------------------------
ACTION to John:  Update the XML sources for XML 1.0 and 1.1
to reflect any errata and the LEIRI reference.


XInclude 3rd Edition
--------------------
ACTION to Paul:  Update the XML sources for Xinclude to reflect 
any errata and the LEIRI reference.


Associating Stylesheets
-----------------------
See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-ss

AssocSS 2nd Ed is now a Recommendation at
http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/REC-xml-stylesheet-20101028/

***ACTION to Henry: Update the Errata document at
http://www.w3.org/1999/06/REC-xml-stylesheet-19990629/errata


xml-model
---------
The ballot has been approved.  There were four comments which
need to be addressed which means there will probably be another
ISO vote.

Some of the comments lead us to tweak our Note.

ACTION to Paul:  Prepare an updated draft of the WG Note to 
reflect the comments.
Received on Monday, 11 April 2011 16:41:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 11 April 2011 16:41:28 GMT