W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > January 2010

Issue holman-1 (substantive, pending) Re: AssocSS comments

From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:06:19 +0100
To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.u67dwtt0idj3kv@simon-pieterss-macbook.local>
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:51:19 +0100, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote:

> Issue holman-1 (substantive, pending)
> Needs clarification of the relation of HTML 'link' header elts to  
> stylesheet PIs
> Origin: G. Ken Holman <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> :  
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-stylesheet-comments/2009Dec/0002.html
>> (1) - the introduction associates HTML link instructions with PIs,but  
>> the introduction is non normative ... is there any normativesection  
>> that describes how a user agent is to interpret the PI valuesor is that  
>> out of scope of this particular specification?  If theanswer is "the  
>> same way as with HTML, then I believe there should bea normative  
>> statement saying so.  If the answer is "the semanticsassociated with  
>> the information expressed using this specificationare out of scope of  
>> the specification", then explicitly stating thatwill prevent readers  
>> from making guesses.
> Discussions:

It's out of scope per WG consensus. I agree we should state this  

Simon Pieters
Opera Software
Received on Wednesday, 27 January 2010 18:06:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:41 UTC