W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > January 2010

RE: AssocSS issue holman-1

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:24:42 -0500
Message-ID: <CF83BAA719FD2C439D25CBB1C9D1D30212254BA9@HQ-MAIL4.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
Henry,

You said you'd look into incorporating some HTML 4 language into
AssocSS.  Here's the latest in that thread.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon Pieters [mailto:simonp@opera.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 2010 January 14 9:12
> To: Grosso, Paul; public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: AssocSS issue holman-1 and holman-2
>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Simon Pieters [mailto:simonp@opera.com]
> >> Sent: Thursday, 2010 January 14 8:31
> >> To: Grosso, Paul; public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> >> Subject: Re: AssocSS issue holman-1 and holman-2
> >>
> >> On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 19:34:49 +0100, Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > "is there any normative section that describes how a user agent
> >> > is to interpret the [pseudo-attribute] values?"
> 
> >> I thought we had agreed to not reference HTML4 for the semantics of
> the
> >> pseudo-attributes.
> >
> > I'm not sure what I think here.  I thought Henry said on yesterday's
> > call that we should put back a reference to HTML 4.0.  Or maybe we
> > need to phrase it some other way.
> >
> > I'm open to suggestions that address Ken's (first) issue.
> 
> I think we should leave it out of scope for this spec. We can say
> explicitly that it's out of scope and left to other specs to define.


Received on Wednesday, 27 January 2010 17:25:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 27 January 2010 17:25:36 GMT