W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > August 2010

FW: short name "xlink" should point to "xlink11"

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:16:33 -0400
Message-ID: <9B2DE9094C827E44988F5ADAA6A2C5DAB06774@HQ-MAIL9.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
FYI.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Jacobs [mailto:ij@w3.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, 2010 August 25 12:07
To: Grosso, Paul
Subject: Re: short name "xlink" should point to "xlink11"


On 25 Aug 2010, at 11:58 AM, Grosso, Paul wrote:

> Hi Ian,
>
> The WG has not made any decision on this matter yet, but
> for background purposes, I've been asked to ask you about
> the possibilities of editing XLink 1.0 in place to make
> some mention of 1.1 so that a reader would at least be
> aware of the existence of XLink 1.1.
>
> We realize we could plan to issue an XLink 1.0 PER just
> to make this change, but that seemed a little excessive
> if there were a simpler path.

Yes, I think we can edit it in place with a status update. Example:
  http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-ref-20040210/

Notes on this:

  1) We have not documented this widely. We are getting more  
experience with it.
  2) It was our intention in the site redesign to provide some  
(minimal) status updates in place, so I believe we have license and  
support for this. We just need to find the right approach.

Feel free to show the WG the above OWL link and see whether they want  
to request something like that of the webmaster.

  _ Ian
Received on Wednesday, 25 August 2010 17:17:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:42 UTC