- From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:26:51 -0400
- To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 12:11 -0400, Grosso, Paul wrote: > Attendees > --------- > Glenn > Paul > Henry > John > > [4 organizations (4 with proxies) present out of 10] no quorum Sorry, we had a 'fridge delivery that came earlier than they said :( (and as it was they damaged the back door and the screen door and....!) [...] > John now thinks xlink should continue to point to 1.0. A possibility that's been done for at least one other spec is to have xlink point to a Web page that lists both versions. > > Proposed: Rescind instructions to the editors of our previous > proposal (which was to insert verbatim the above quoted paragraph) > and request a new PER call based on the draft at > http://www.w3.org/XML/2010/05/xml-stylesheet/diff.html > and DanielG's acceptance of that draft at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Aug/0002 > > ACTION to Paul: Put the previous proposal to the WG in email. (I'm OK with that too) Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org www.advogato.org
Received on Wednesday, 25 August 2010 16:26:53 UTC