W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > November 2009

Re: Comments on AssocSS Editor's Draft 10 November 2009

From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:53:05 +0100
To: "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.u3h32rv1idj3kv@simon-pieterss-macbook.local>
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:14:12 +0100, Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com> wrote:


>> Is the following paragraph ok? Should it say tokens instead of symbols?
>
> Moot, since you accepted my suggested rewording below that
> avoids the issue.
>
>>
>> "The productions in this specification use the same notation as used in
>> the XML specification [XML]. Symbols in the grammar that are not
>> defined
>> in this specification are defined in the XML specification."

Forgot to comment on this part. The question is not moot since the  
paragraph quoted above is still in the draft (in the terminology section;  
maybe that's out of place, maybe the terminology and conformance sections  
should be merged, since infoset and XML are more of dependencies than mere  
terminology).

-- 
Simon Pieters
Opera Software
Received on Monday, 16 November 2009 18:54:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:41 UTC