- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 11:57:43 -0500
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
The XML Core WG telcons are every other week. Our next telcon will be March 11. ********************************************************** NOTE: Most of North America will be starting daylight saving time on March 8 whereas the UK and Europe will not switch for another three weeks. That means that callers from the UK and Europe will need to dial in one hour EARLIER than usual local time for our telcons of March 11 and March 25. ********************************************************** Status and open actions ======================= Unicode normalization in XML 1.0 -------------------------------- Addison Phillips of I18N sent email about Unicode Normalization in XML 1.0 5th Ed.; see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Feb/0019 Allowing canonical equivalents to be treated as identical directly in XML implies that an element's start tag and end tag could be character-for-character different. This is not currently the case--such would be not well-formed and the input is therefore not XML--and the WG does not want to make it the case. We could add some "motherhood" notes saying that XML producers SHOULD produce normalized output. We will revisit this on our next telcon with the hope that we can have Richard and Francois join us. XML Test Suite -------------- See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-test-suite Henry/Richard discussed the test suite issues raised by Frans Englich: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-testsuite/2007Mar/ ACTION: Richard to construct a test case for these issues. Namespaces in XML 1.0/1.1 ------------------------- See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.0 and http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.1. The NS PE doc is at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2001/05/proposed-xml-names-errata.html Richard added some discussion at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2001/05/proposed-xml-names-errata.html#npe29 The WG agreed with his direction and asked that he go forward with it. ACTION to Richard: Fill in a proposed resolution for NPE29. xml:id ------ The xml:id Recommendation is at http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-xml-id-20050909/ John Cowan submitted a proposed erratum at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Jan/0009 Consensus: The sentence "A document that uses xml:id attributes that have a declared type other than xs:ID will always generate xml:id errors" in Appendix D.3 should be deleted. ACTION to Henry: Update the Errata document at http://www.w3.org/2005/09/xml-id-errata ACTION to Henry: Think about the appropriateness of the same sentence in Appendix D.2. XLink 1.1 --------- See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xlink1.1 The XLink 1.1 Last Call has been published at http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-xlink11-20080331/ The LC review period ended 16 May 2008. Norm has prepared a DoC at http://www.w3.org/XML/2008/05/xlinklc/ ACTION to Norm: Ensure the DoC is up to date. ACTION to Norm: Update XLink 1.1 to refer to the LEIRI note. There's an open question about whether the XSD/DTD should default the xlink:type attribute value. None of this effects our last call because the XSD/DTD are not normative. ACTION to Henry, John: Produce a basic level conformance XSD and RelaxNG schema for XLink. Paul asks us to consider skipping CR and going directly to PR. ACTION to Henry: Review the history and make a recommendation as to whether we should skip CR and go directly to PR. ACTION to Paul: Draft a PR transition request. XInclude 3rd Edition PER ------------------------ See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude XInclude 2nd Edition is at: http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xinclude-20061115 ACTION to Daniel: Produce a PER-ready draft of XInclude 3rd Ed with appropriate references to the IRI RFC for LEIRIs. Associating Stylesheets ----------------------- See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-ss Associating stylesheets with XML version 1.0 is at: http://www.w3.org/1999/06/REC-xml-stylesheet-19990629/ The Errata document is at: http://www.w3.org/1999/06/REC-xml-stylesheet-19990629/errata Simon has requested we consider revisions; see his email at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Feb/0002 and his suggested draft at http://simon.html5.org/specs/xml-stylesheet5 See also Simon's email at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Feb/0014 outlining various issues. Paul sent email giving Arbortext's behavior and other comments at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Feb/0022 ACTION to Henry: Determine Saxon behavior in various erroneous cases and reply to Simon's email with results and suggested resolutions.
Received on Monday, 2 March 2009 17:03:13 UTC