Re: Editor's review copy of XML Namespaces 1.0 Third Edition

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Grosso, Paul writes:

>> > We closed NPE20 and NPE22 with no action needed; Paul informed I18N:
>> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0055
>> 
>> > We had CONSENSUS not to add ns prefix undeclaration to NS 1.0 3rd Ed.
>> > Paul informed XML Security at
>> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0054
>> > and Frederick replied (with no concerns) at
>> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0058
>> 
>> Not clear what you want me to do wrt this one. . .
>
> That was just the record of our decision to close NPE 20 and 22,
> that was not a separate action.

Prefix undeclaration is not mentioned in NPE20 or 22.  I'm still
confused.

ht
- -- 
       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
                         Half-time member of W3C Team
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFKbbHzkjnJixAXWBoRAln+AJ9FebAoeJtpaOfNRN7uQNnAXYHKuwCfS9+n
3RXZcUSrSMJgxxajEFIqB2U=
=Waek
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Monday, 27 July 2009 13:56:40 UTC