-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Grosso, Paul writes: >> > We closed NPE20 and NPE22 with no action needed; Paul informed I18N: >> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0055 >> >> > We had CONSENSUS not to add ns prefix undeclaration to NS 1.0 3rd Ed. >> > Paul informed XML Security at >> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0054 >> > and Frederick replied (with no concerns) at >> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0058 >> >> Not clear what you want me to do wrt this one. . . > > That was just the record of our decision to close NPE 20 and 22, > that was not a separate action. Prefix undeclaration is not mentioned in NPE20 or 22. I'm still confused. ht - -- Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFKbbHzkjnJixAXWBoRAln+AJ9FebAoeJtpaOfNRN7uQNnAXYHKuwCfS9+n 3RXZcUSrSMJgxxajEFIqB2U= =Waek -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----Received on Monday, 27 July 2009 13:56:40 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 July 2009 13:56:40 GMT