W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > July 2009

RE: Editor's review copy of XML Namespaces 1.0 Third Edition

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:53:16 -0400
Message-ID: <CF83BAA719FD2C439D25CBB1C9D1D30210576C39@HQ-MAIL4.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Cc: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henry S. Thompson [mailto:ht@inf.ed.ac.uk]
> Sent: Monday, 2009 July 27 8:49
> To: Grosso, Paul
> Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Editor's review copy of XML Namespaces 1.0 Third Edition
> 
> Grosso, Paul writes:
> 
> > Things are looking good, but one more housekeeping chore.  Re:
> >
> > We closed NPE20 and NPE22 with no action needed; Paul informed I18N:
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0055
> >
> > ACTION to Henry:  Close NPE20 and NPE22 with no action/changes.
> 
> Done == recorded in [1].

Thanks.

> 
> > We had CONSENSUS not to add ns prefix undeclaration to NS 1.0 3rd
Ed.
> > Paul informed XML Security at
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0054
> > and Frederick replied (with no concerns) at
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0058
> 
> Not clear what you want me to do wrt this one. . .

That was just the record of our decision to close NPE 20 and 22,
that was not a separate action.

thanks,

paul

> 
> ht
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2001/05/proposed-xml-names-errata.html
Received on Monday, 27 July 2009 13:54:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:40 UTC