RE: Editor's review copy of XML Namespaces 1.0 Third Edition

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henry S. Thompson [mailto:ht@inf.ed.ac.uk]
> Sent: Monday, 2009 July 27 8:49
> To: Grosso, Paul
> Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Editor's review copy of XML Namespaces 1.0 Third Edition
> 
> Grosso, Paul writes:
> 
> > Things are looking good, but one more housekeeping chore.  Re:
> >
> > We closed NPE20 and NPE22 with no action needed; Paul informed I18N:
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0055
> >
> > ACTION to Henry:  Close NPE20 and NPE22 with no action/changes.
> 
> Done == recorded in [1].

Thanks.

> 
> > We had CONSENSUS not to add ns prefix undeclaration to NS 1.0 3rd
Ed.
> > Paul informed XML Security at
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0054
> > and Frederick replied (with no concerns) at
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0058
> 
> Not clear what you want me to do wrt this one. . .

That was just the record of our decision to close NPE 20 and 22,
that was not a separate action.

thanks,

paul

> 
> ht
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2001/05/proposed-xml-names-errata.html