RE: Editor's review copy of XML Namespaces 1.0 Third Edition

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Grosso, Paul
> Sent: Wednesday, 2009 July 22 8:24
> To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Editor's review copy of XML Namespaces 1.0 Third Edition
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-
> > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Henry S. Thompson
> > Sent: Wednesday, 2009 July 22 7:33
> > To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> > Subject: Editor's review copy of XML Namespaces 1.0 Third Edition
> >
> > Now available, in plain and diffed versions.  Please review
carefully:
> >
> >
> http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2006/04/xml-names-2e/xml-names-10-3e.html
> >
>
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2006/04/xml-names-2e/xml-names-10-3e-diff.ht
> ml


> Comparing the diff version with the errata document, I note:
> 
> 1.  We turned "attributes unique" into an NSC, but there is no
>     corresponding erratum for this.  This doesn't really bother
>     me, but I thought I'd mention it.

I found the "problem".  NPE29 at
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2001/05/proposed-xml-names-errata.html#NPE29
was never reflected in the Errata document at
http://www.w3.org/XML/2006/xml-names-errata

That NPE should have its Status updated to indicate it was resolved and
published as erratum Nexx to edition 1.0-2, and the Errata document
needs to have that erratum added to it (and that document's date 
should be updated accordingly).

paul