W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > August 2009

RE: NS 1.0 3rd Ed draft

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 13:16:19 -0400
Message-ID: <CF83BAA719FD2C439D25CBB1C9D1D3021066DD51@HQ-MAIL4.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henry S. Thompson [mailto:ht@inf.ed.ac.uk]
> Sent: Monday, 2009 August 03 5:51
> To: Grosso, Paul
> Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: NS 1.0 3rd Ed draft
> 
> Grosso, Paul writes:
> 
> > I'm not really sure what to do here.
> >
> > We had said we would publish a pre-PER draft, so I don't really want
> > to submit a PER pub request, but what do I want to submit?
> 
> Aren't you gettting confused with what we agreed wrt the Stylesheet PI
> work?  All the changes to Namespaces are small, and have been
> published as errata, so there's no problem with going straight to PER.

Right, I was confused.  Unfortunately...

> 
> > We can put a publicly accessible draft in XML/2009/* and announce
it,
> > but do we need a pub request to do that?
> 
> I've put the PER in place at
> 
>    http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/PER-xml-names-20090806/

...I've now replaced one confusion with another.  Going to
http://www.w3.org/2005/08/online_xslt/xslt?xmlfile=http://www.w3.org/200
5/08/01-transitions.html&xslfile=http://www.w3.org/2005/08/transitions.x
sl&docstatus=per-tr
(don't ask me why it's such an ugly URI) I'm trying to figure out if
I should send a transition request or a pub request.  It looks
like I should send a transition request.

But it also looks like we need to have a transition meeting with
the director--is that the case?  

So is the next thing I should do is send a transition request?

paul
Received on Monday, 3 August 2009 17:17:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 3 August 2009 17:17:37 GMT