Re: NS 1.0 3rd Ed draft

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Grosso, Paul writes:

> I'm not really sure what to do here.
>
> We had said we would publish a pre-PER draft, so I don't really want
> to submit a PER pub request, but what do I want to submit?

Aren't you gettting confused with what we agreed wrt the Stylesheet PI
work?  All the changes to Namespaces are small, and have been
published as errata, so there's no problem with going straight to PER.

> We can put a publicly accessible draft in XML/2009/* and announce it,
> but do we need a pub request to do that?

I've put the PER in place at

   http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/PER-xml-names-20090806/

Pubrules checker is happy except for a pointer to the review form and,
as usual, the patent policy boilerplate.  I'm worried that if Ian has
left on holiday we're going to stall on this. . .  I will try to reach
him later today.

ht
- -- 
       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
                         Half-time member of W3C Team
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFKdsEokjnJixAXWBoRAsOaAJ9D6L52bzTYYYP2PaR8rBJUFWKdIQCfTCKo
/sceTN3eMFwtgU3+Pc85RXE=
=B+Xg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Monday, 3 August 2009 10:52:07 UTC