W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > April 2009

Re: XLink 1.1 open issues [was: Agenda for XML Core WG telcon of 2009 April 22]

From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:37:25 -0400
To: "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20090422223725.GG10247@mercury.ccil.org>
Grosso, Paul scripsit:

> Issue 6:  use of xs:NCNAME in non-normative w3c schema of xlink 1.1
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> I don't see any such uses in the sample schema any more.
> 
> I do see NCNAME in the RelaxNG schema.  I don't know RelaxNG,
> so I'm just assuming this is okay.
> 
> But in appendix D, I do see 3 uses of {xsd:NCNAME} which
> I wonder about.  Is this a RelaxNG thing, or--if this is
> an XSD thing--should that be {xsd:NCName}?

It should indeed be xsd:NCName in the RELAX NG schema.

-- 
MEET US AT POINT ORANGE AT MIDNIGHT BRING YOUR DUCK OR PREPARE TO FACE WUGGUMS
John Cowan      cowan@ccil.org      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Received on Wednesday, 22 April 2009 22:38:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 22 April 2009 22:38:03 GMT