W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > April 2009

Re: XLink 1.1 open issues [was: Agenda for XML Core WG telcon of 2009 April 22]

From: Innovimax W3C <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:53:46 +0200
Message-ID: <546c6c1c0904220753w33eda91pd203e5bb67f175af@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Paul,

On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com> wrote:

>
> Issue 6:  use of xs:NCNAME in non-normative w3c schema of xlink 1.1
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> I don't see any such uses in the sample schema any more.
>
> I do see NCNAME in the RelaxNG schema.  I don't know RelaxNG,
> so I'm just assuming this is okay.
>
> But in appendix D, I do see 3 uses of {xsd:NCNAME} which
> I wonder about.  Is this a RelaxNG thing, or--if this is
> an XSD thing--should that be {xsd:NCName}?


Relax NG is based XML Schema Part II (Datatype). So it should be xsd:NCName
as the OP suggests


Mohamed



-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 
Received on Wednesday, 22 April 2009 14:54:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 22 April 2009 14:54:21 GMT