- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 10:29:23 -0400
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
We were to have an XML Core WG phone call this Wednesday, but over half the WG (include both chairs and the team contact) have given regrets, so I am cancelling this call. Since XML Core WG telcons are every other week, our next telcon will November 5. [FWIW, the UK and Europe end Daylight time on October 26 and North America ends Daylight time on November 2, so our November 5 call will be during standard time local time for all regular telcon participants.] Status and open actions ======================= Document reviews ---------------- The Last Call of Efficient XML Interchange Format 1.0 is at: http://www.w3.org/TR/exi/ The Last Call review period ends on 7th November 2008. John's last review is at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Oct/0025 Change since previous publications are outlined at http://www.w3.org/TR/exi/#changes ACTION to John: Review this and give us any comments. XML 1.0 5th Edition ------------------- See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-errata The XML 1.0 5th Edition PER was published at http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/PER-xml-20080205/ An implementation report is at http://www.w3.org/XML/2008/01/xml10-5e-implementation The DoC is at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2008/09/xml-5e/disposition.html The latest almost-Rec-ready draft is at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2008/09/XML5e/ ACTION to Henry: Organize a transition telcon for XML 1.0 5th Ed. XML Test Suite -------------- See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-test-suite Henry/Richard discussed the test suite issues raised by Frans Englich: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-testsuite/2007Mar/ ACTION: Richard to construct a test case for these issues. Namespaces in XML 1.0/1.1 ------------------------- See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.0 and http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.1. Richard has partially updated the NS PE doc at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2001/05/proposed-xml-names-errata.html Richard added some discussion at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2001/05/proposed-xml-names-errata.html#npe29 The WG agreed with his direction and asked that he go forward with it. ACTION to Richard: Fill in a proposed resolution for NPE29. ACTION to Richard: Add an NPE changing URIs to IRIs in NS 1.0. LEIRIs ------ See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#leiri A summary of what specs need to be revised to reference LEIRIs is at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Dec/0045 The draft WG Note defining LEIRIs is at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2008/09/NOTE-leiri-20080926/ Henry sent out a transition request at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2008OctDec/0021 but then there were complications, and now we're into the TPAC week. ACTION to Henry: Continue to progress the LEIRI WG Note. XML Base 2nd Edition 2nd PER ---------------------------- See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-base The (second) XML Base (Second Edition) PER has been published at http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/PER-xmlbase-20080320/ and announced at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2008JanMar/0112 The XML Base PER review period ended 30 June 2008. Richard developed an initial draft DoC document for XML Base at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2008/09/xmlbase-2e/disposition.html ACTION to Richard: Finalize the DoC. See also http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2008Sep/0015 for more suggestions on how to present the DoC. Eventual ACTION to Henry: Take XML Base 2nd Ed to Rec. XLink 1.1 --------- See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xlink1.1 The XLink 1.1 Last Call has been published at http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-xlink11-20080331/ The LC review period ended 16 May 2008. Norm has prepared a DoC at http://www.w3.org/XML/2008/05/xlinklc/ ACTION to Henry: Continue to get the XSD for XLink at an accessible URI. There's an open question about whether the XSD/DTD should default the xlink:type attribute value. None of this effects our last call because the XSD/DTD are not normative. John asked whether we should have two schemas, one for each of our conformance levels. ACTION to Henry, John: Think about having a basic level conformance XSD for XLink. Paul asks us to consider skipping CR and going directly to PR. ACTION to Henry: Review the history and make a recommendation as to whether we should skip CR and go directly to PR. XInclude 3rd Edition PER ------------------------ See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude XInclude 2nd Edition is at: http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xinclude-20061115 ACTION to Daniel: Produce a PER-ready draft of XInclude 3rd Ed with appropriate references to the IRI RFC for LEIRIs.
Received on Monday, 20 October 2008 14:30:35 UTC