W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > March 2008

Re: Transition Request: (2nd) PER Request for XML Base Second Edition

From: Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:05:27 +0000 (GMT)
To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Cc: "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>, timbl@w3.org, steve@w3.org, <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>, <webreq@w3.org>, <chairs@w3.org>, <w3t-comm@w3.org>, <michelsu@microsoft.com>, John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Message-Id: <20080317140527.4422B35AF5E@macpro.inf.ed.ac.uk>


> Uh, OK, veryt clear. So IRI is the preferred term for all uses
> except specialised ones such as a system identifier.
> 
> How come XML Base needs one?

Because the original XML Base spec used similar wording to that
used in XLink and XML.

http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlbase/#escaping

-- Richard
Received on Monday, 17 March 2008 14:06:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 17 March 2008 14:06:36 GMT