RE: XLink 1.1 conformance: two types?

Does anybody have any thoughts on this suggestion?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of John Cowan
> Sent: Monday, 2008 February 25 15:23
> To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: XLink 1.1 conformance: two types?
> 
> 
> I am thinking that it would be a Good Thing to split the application
> conformance section (3.3) so that there is a notion of "simple
> conformance" and "full conformance".  Simple conformance means that
> the application recognizes only simple links; full 
> conformance means it
> recognizes both simple and extended links.  I don't have any proposed
> text for this, though.