W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > March 2008

RE: XLink 1.1 conformance: two types?

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:42:19 -0400
Message-ID: <CF83BAA719FD2C439D25CBB1C9D1D3020AB349F6@HQ-MAIL4.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>

Does anybody have any thoughts on this suggestion?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of John Cowan
> Sent: Monday, 2008 February 25 15:23
> To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: XLink 1.1 conformance: two types?
> 
> 
> I am thinking that it would be a Good Thing to split the application
> conformance section (3.3) so that there is a notion of "simple
> conformance" and "full conformance".  Simple conformance means that
> the application recognizes only simple links; full 
> conformance means it
> recognizes both simple and extended links.  I don't have any proposed
> text for this, though.
Received on Monday, 10 March 2008 14:42:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 10 March 2008 14:42:26 GMT