RE: Transition Request: PER Request for XML 1.0 5th Edition

On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 10:59 -0500, Grosso, Paul wrote:
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ian B. Jacobs [mailto:ij@w3.org] 
> > Sent: Monday, 2008 January 28 9:45
> > To: Grosso, Paul
> > Cc: Jules Clement-Ripoche; François Yergeau; timbl@w3.org; 
> > steve@w3.org; public-xml-core-wg@w3.org; webreq@w3.org
> > Subject: RE: Transition Request: PER Request for XML 1.0 5th Edition
> > 
> > 
> > On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 10:20 -0500, Grosso, Paul wrote:
> > > I have completely given up trying to figure out IPP for
> > > these older specs.  I just wait for Ian to give us whatever
> > > magic incantation he wants us to put in there (which changes
> > > every time we issue a new edition).
> > > 
> > > Ian?
> 
> > I propose, in the interest of stability, that we use exactly the
> > same patent policy boilerplate as in XML 1.0 4E (even though I think
> > the pubrules checker is correct to suggest adding the first sentence).
> > 
> > Any thoughts?
> 
> I assume that means we don't have to make any changes to what 
> Francois has there right now, and that sounds perfect to me.

+1 to "same as 4E" for that paragraph.

 _ Ian
-- 
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/
Tel:                     +1 718 260-9447