RE: Transition Request: PER Request for XML 1.0 5th Edition

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian B. Jacobs [mailto:ij@w3.org] 
> Sent: Monday, 2008 January 28 9:45
> To: Grosso, Paul
> Cc: Jules Clement-Ripoche; François Yergeau; timbl@w3.org; 
> steve@w3.org; public-xml-core-wg@w3.org; webreq@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Transition Request: PER Request for XML 1.0 5th Edition
> 
> 
> On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 10:20 -0500, Grosso, Paul wrote:
> > I have completely given up trying to figure out IPP for
> > these older specs.  I just wait for Ian to give us whatever
> > magic incantation he wants us to put in there (which changes
> > every time we issue a new edition).
> > 
> > Ian?

> I propose, in the interest of stability, that we use exactly the
> same patent policy boilerplate as in XML 1.0 4E (even though I think
> the pubrules checker is correct to suggest adding the first sentence).
> 
> Any thoughts?

I assume that means we don't have to make any changes to what 
Francois has there right now, and that sounds perfect to me.

paul