W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > January 2007

RE: XBL review

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:46:29 -0500
Message-ID: <CF83BAA719FD2C439D25CBB1C9D1D302062DB74A@HQ-MAIL4.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>

I saw this during the telcon, but then forgot to go back and
discuss it.

Please make any comments about this proposed review in email
within the next 48 hours so that we can send this in before
the end of this week.  Lack of objections means we will consider
this the XML Core WG review.

paul

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Norman Walsh
> Sent: Wednesday, 2007 January 31 10:13
> To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: XBL review
> 
> XBL is a fairly complex specification describing the interactions
> between user interaction, DOM manipulations (scripting), and CSS. A
> variety of bindings that might be employed to control various aspects
> of this interaction are proposed.
> 
> To the extent that I understood the XBL spec, from an XML Core
> perspective, I noted only two areas on which we might wish to comment.
> 
> > 1.4.7. Extension Mechanisms
> 
> Speaks of the per-element partition of attribute names. This is, I
> think, a holdover from the first edition of Namespaces in XML. I
> suggest that it be updated to the terminology in the latest Namespaces
> REC.
> 
> > 2.16. The id Attribute of XBL Elements
> 
> I recommend that they spell the ID attribute "xml:id".
> 
>                                         Be seeing you,
>                                           norm
> 
> -- 
> Norman Walsh
> XML Standards Architect
> Sun Microsystems, Inc.
> 
Received on Wednesday, 31 January 2007 16:47:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:37 UTC