> This leaves only the case where the document [base URI] is not known. > Will this work to avoid a negative impact of '../../...'?: > > In the absence of a document [base URI], assume one of the form > "file:/a/a/a/" > with more 'a' steps then the total number of '..' steps in all the > xml:base in the document That's the kind of hack I was thinking of. -- RichardReceived on Wednesday, 15 March 2006 16:37:48 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:33 GMT