W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > March 2006

Re: Agenda for XML Core WG telcon of 2006 March 15

From: Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 16:34:50 +0000 (GMT)
To: Glenn Marcy <gmarcy@us.ibm.com>, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <20060315163450.9F4085BC6D8@macintosh.inf.ed.ac.uk>


> On the same line it next says ... with "standalone='no'", ...
> 
> I would think that without "standalone='yes'" is the correct form.
> Otherwise, how is a document without a standalone declaration at all
> to be treated?

I think you're right, but we decided not to do anything about that
when we discussed it at the face-to-face.

-- Richard

Received on Wednesday, 15 March 2006 16:35:00 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Richard Tobin: "Re: Appling inheritance rule to xml:base, was Re: FINAL minutes for the XML"
Previous message: Henry S. Thompson: "Re: Appling inheritance rule to xml:base, was Re: FINAL minutes for the XML"
In reply to: Glenn Marcy: "Re: Agenda for XML Core WG telcon of 2006 March 15"
Next in thread: Richard Tobin: "Re: Agenda for XML Core WG telcon of 2006 March 15"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:33 GMT