W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > June 2006

RE: Draft [2] Transition Request: PER Request for Namespaces in XML 1.0 Second Edition

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 10:30:21 -0400
Message-ID: <CF83BAA719FD2C439D25CBB1C9D1D3020381F7A9@HQ-MAIL4.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org 
> Sent: Friday, 2006 June 02 09:22
> To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Draft [2] Transition Request: PER Request for 
> Namespaces in XML 1.0 Second Edition
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Henry S. Thompson [mailto:ht@inf.ed.ac.uk] 
> > Sent: Friday, 2006 June 02 09:07
> > To: Grosso, Paul
> > Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> > Subject: Re: Draft [2] Transition Request: PER Request for 
> > Namespaces in XML 1.0 Second Edition

> > Following the XML 1.0 precedent, the eventual "This 
> version:" pointer
> > will be http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xml-names-2006????
> 
> Good point (except I think you want s/2004/2006/).
> 
> That URL doesn't get mentioned in the PR request, correct?
> 
> Are you saying that Richard should make the "This version:"
> value in the PR-ready draft that URL?  Or should the 
> "This version:" value in the PR-ready draft be
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/PER-xml-names-2006 ?

The above three occurrences of "PR" in my email should be "PER".

paul
Received on Friday, 2 June 2006 14:30:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:34 GMT