W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > June 2006

RE: Draft [2] Transition Request: PER Request for Namespaces in XML 1.0 Second Edition

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 10:21:47 -0400
Message-ID: <CF83BAA719FD2C439D25CBB1C9D1D3020381F78D@HQ-MAIL4.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henry S. Thompson [mailto:ht@inf.ed.ac.uk] 
> Sent: Friday, 2006 June 02 09:07
> To: Grosso, Paul
> Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Draft [2] Transition Request: PER Request for 
> Namespaces in XML 1.0 Second Edition
> 
> Grosso, Paul writes:
> 
> > Henry (and others), there is in interesting issue here.
> > The "short name" for NS 1.0 is REC-xml-names.  Nowadays,
> > we'd just use "xml-names" (viz. xml-names11), but since
> > this is just a new edition, I'm assuming we must keep
> > the original short name (as we are doing with XML 1.0).
> > Let me know if you think otherwise.  Aside from the URI
> > for the final Rec, this also affects the URI to translations
> > which is embedded in the Status section.
> 
> I agree -- it's REC-xml-names.
> 
> Following the XML 1.0 precedent, the eventual "This version:" pointer
> will be http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xml-names-2006????
> 

Good point (except I think you want s/2004/2006/).

That URL doesn't get mentioned in the PR request, correct?

Are you saying that Richard should make the "This version:"
value in the PR-ready draft that URL?  Or should the 
"This version:" value in the PR-ready draft be
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/PER-xml-names-2006 ?


> > Richard and Henry, we need to determine a URI for the errata
> > document to this NS 1.0 2nd Edition.  I've invented one below
> > (marked with @@@).  Let me know if you want something else,
> > and please plan to put some skeleton document at that location.
> 
> That looks right to me -- note that the current pointer in
> http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2006/04/xml-names-2e/xml-names-10-2e.html
> is to an xml-names11-errata name, which needs to be fixed. . .

Correct, ACTION to Richard.

paul
Received on Friday, 2 June 2006 14:24:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:34 GMT