W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > February 2006

forking QNames [was: Agenda for XML Core WG telcon of 2006 February 15]

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:47:08 -0500
Message-ID: <CF83BAA719FD2C439D25CBB1C9D1D3020252844A@HQ-MAIL4.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Grosso, Paul
> Sent: Monday, 2006 February 13 11:53
> To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Agenda for XML Core WG telcon of 2006 February 15

> 10.  Henry added a "forking QNames" item:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2005Nov/0000
> 
> We had some discussion last week.
> 
> Norm argues that we should object to the use of the
> QName syntax for things that aren't QNames.  He also
> objects to the invention of a new mechanism for declaring
> things that look like namespaces when they aren't really.
> 
> Norm is still trying to understand whether there is an
> issue yet, and he needs to wait until they publish a
> document to be sure.
> 
> ACTION to Norm:  Raise this concern at the TAG level
> at the appropriate time.

Is this something we want to try to discuss with 
the TAG at the f2f in Mandelieu?

Especially, Norm, Henry, what do you think?

paul
Received on Monday, 13 February 2006 20:47:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:35 UTC