W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > February 2006

XLink charmod conformance [was: Agenda for XML Core WG telcon of 2006 February 15]

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:38:05 -0500
Message-ID: <CF83BAA719FD2C439D25CBB1C9D1D30202528443@HQ-MAIL4.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>

Francois,

Please let us know what you think about the
I18N issue below by (or during) this week's
telcon.

thanks,

paul

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org On Behalf Of Grosso, Paul
> Sent: Monday, 2006 February 13 11:53
> To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Agenda for XML Core WG telcon of 2006 February 15

> 3.  XLink update.

> Re: XLink 1.1: Charmod conformance
> ----------------------------------
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2
006JanMar/0048
> Björn says XLink 1.1 should NFC-normalize IRIs.
> 
> Richard replied at:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2
006JanMar/0070
> Bjoern replied at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2
006JanMar/0075
> and Richard re-replied at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2
006JanMar/0089
> and the thread ends there (as of the writing of this agenda).
> 
> We still need to close this thread. *****
> 
> We believe that our specs are correct as is, and perhaps
> the Charmod spec could be clearer here, but that isn't
> our remit.
> 
> ACTION to Francois:  Review this thread and send email
> to the XML Core WG.
> 
> Unless Francois comes back and says we're wrong, we will
> leave it as is and flag this issue as an outstanding dissent 
> in the DoC, perhaps with a note that we've sent this issue
> to I18N.
Received on Monday, 13 February 2006 20:40:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:35 UTC