W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > February 2006

Re: "URI reference" "checking"

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 12:00:51 +0000
To: "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Cc: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <f5b3birwhho.fsf@erasmus.inf.ed.ac.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Grosso, Paul writes:

> 1.  Is this a Note or just another paragraph?
>
> 2.  Exactly where in the spec should Norm add this?

As a 2nd para. of the existing Note in 5.4 (note, Norm, that this is
not currently being styled as a Note. . .)

>>   "Although XLink applications need not enforce URI syntactic
>>   constraints, XLink applications which use libraries which _do_
>>   detect violations of the syntactic rules of [RFC 3896] SHOULD NOT
>>   recover silently."

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFD7IB1kjnJixAXWBoRAp7DAJ4jt0SY7nKZbndajNMW/ib+MSOWTACeNsWK
iKwzNd4MMy10FP0eXA9d2GM=
=wzX5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 10 February 2006 12:01:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:35 UTC