W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > September 2005

Re: Interesting query on xml-dev

From: Daniel Veillard <daniel@veillard.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 23:58:58 +0200
To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Cc: Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk>, public-xml-core-wg <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20050927215858.GA9487@daniel.veillard.com>

On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 08:38:56PM +0100, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
> Hash: SHA1
> Not sure what the best answer is, but also not sure whether the recent empty
> URI change we've discussed is involved here -- see
>   http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200509/msg00249.html

 An implementation not limited to the cripped REC subset and implementing
#xpointer() and here() can use it to have link survive the inclusion process.

  The empty URI change won't work in that case the included resource is in
a subdir so the relative generated URI is not empty (assuming I understood
what you meant by 'empty URI change').


Daniel Veillard      | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
daniel@veillard.com  | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | 
Received on Tuesday, 27 September 2005 21:57:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:35 UTC