W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > May 2005

Paul's QA Framework comment [was: Minutes for XML Core WG telcon of 2005 May 25]

From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 15:33:06 -0400
Message-ID: <F13E1BF26B19BA40AF3C0DE7D4DA0C0304B13995@ati-mail01.arbortext.local>
To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>

> From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org On Behalf Of Paul Grosso
> Sent: Wednesday, 25 May, 2005 10:50
> To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Minutes for XML Core WG telcon of 2005 May 25

> > The XML Core WG reviewed the QA Framework Last Call and had
> > some issues:
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Jan/0025
> > The QA WG response at 
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005May/0041
> > left many of us unsatisfied.  See
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2005May/0004
> > summarizing things and giving other pointers.
> > See also the thread starting at
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2005May/0042
> > Paul sent "holding" email in response to the QA response at:
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2005May/0054
> > and Karl answered at
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2005May/0055
> > Paul remains confused and concerned; if he is the only
> > one, we'll let this drop, but since others seemed to have
> > concerns in the past, we'll try to find out one more time.
> 
> We discussed this once more.  Other WG members shared
> some of Paul's concerns/confusion, but we decided not
> to make a WG statement.
> 
> ACTION to Paul:  Post an individual reply to www-qa 
> and point the XML Core WG to that reply in case anyone
> else cares to say anything further.


I just posted my "Objection to resolution of LC comment" at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005May/0112

paul
Received on Wednesday, 25 May 2005 19:33:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:32 GMT