RE: Minutes for XML Core WG telcon of 2005 May 18

> From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Norman Walsh
> Sent: Wednesday, 18 May, 2005 11:35
> To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Minutes for XML Core WG telcon of 2005 May 18

> | 2. Miscellaneous administrivia and document reviews.

> | The XML Core WG reviewed the QA Framework Last Call and had
> | some issues:
> | http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Jan/0025
> | The QA WG response at 
> | http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005May/0041
> | left many of us unsatisfied.  See
> | http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2005May/0004
> | summarizing things and giving other pointers.
> | See also the thread starting at
> | http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2005May/0042
> | If the WG can agree on some statement, I think we should send it in
> | before the end of the day this Wednesday.  If the WG does not have
> | consensus to send anything, then individual WG members should feel
> | free to send comments.  If nothing else, we owe it to all to make a
> | statement at Last Call time so that we are justified in re-raising
> | the issue at later stages.
> 
> No group statement was suggested. Individual members are encouraged
> to send their comments. Perhaps we'll revisit next week?

The deadline for saying we don't accept they resolution is today.

I will make a response to let them know we're still thinking about it.

> | 4. XML errata.  The published 1.0 errata document is [8], the
> |    published 1.1 errata document is [9], and the new (public)
> |    Potential Errata (PE) document is [7]. 
> |
> | We had a question about the XML Test Suite arise; see
> | http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2005Mar/0037
> |
> | Awaiting response from Richard.
> 
> Continued to next week.

Richard just took care of this:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2005May/0047

paul

Received on Wednesday, 18 May 2005 16:01:40 UTC