W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > June 2005

RE: DRAFT: Transition Request: PR Request forxml:id

From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 09:20:49 -0400
Message-ID: <F13E1BF26B19BA40AF3C0DE7D4DA0C0304DCB91C@ati-mail01.arbortext.local>
To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Cc: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>

> From: Henry S. Thompson [mailto:ht@inf.ed.ac.uk] 
> Sent: Wednesday, 08 June, 2005 5:19
> To: Paul Grosso
> Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: DRAFT: Transition Request: PR Request forxml:id
> 
> Paul Grosso writes:
> 
> > The xml:id 1.0 specification was published as a Candidate
> > Recommendation on 8 February 2005. The list of issues that 
> > were raised during CR and their disposition can be found at:
> > @@@@@@@@@@@@@ [Where is this? Does it exist?]
> 
> See recent message.
> 
> > The implementation results are available at: 
> > http://www.w3.org/XML/2005/01/xml-id/ @@@@@@@ Norm this needs work
> 
> I think we can/should cite the test suite and the report separately,
> say
> 
>  The Working Group has developed a test suite for use in testing
>  interoperability, which is described at
>  http://www.w3.org/XML/Test/xml-id/.
> 
>  An implementation report, describing the results of five
>  implementations, is available at [1].
> 
> ht
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/2005/01/xml-id-implementation.html

I'm confused here.

My draft PR request email says:

 The test suite for xml:id is available at:
 http://www.w3.org/XML/Test/xml-id/

 The implementation results are available at: 
 http://www.w3.org/XML/2005/01/xml-id/ @@@@@@@ Norm this needs work

Isn't that citing them separately?

The plan for the implementation results is that the page
at the above URL (which already exists) will be a "cover
page/overall report" and will also point to the individual
implementation reports (already there).

paul
Received on Wednesday, 8 June 2005 13:20:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:32 GMT