- From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 18:24:00 -0400
- To: "XML Core WG" <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
Richard, Henry,
Are either of you still able to post to xml-dev,
and would you?
Henry, I think you were going to send something on to
xml-schema-dev and chairs once you saw John's posting,
so I guess you can take it from here.
paul
-----Original Message-----
From: John Cowan [mailto:jcowan@reutershealth.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 2004 September 07 16:49
To: Paul Grosso
Cc: XML Core WG
Subject: Failed xml-dev posting
Paul Grosso scripsit:
> ACTION to JohnC: Make an announcement to xml-dev that we plan
> to make this change and request any feedback be sent to xml-editor.
Apparently, I can't post to xml-dev any more, thus joining the crew
of people that lists.xml.org doesn't like. Here's what I twice
tried to post:
The W3C's XML Core WG is considering a change to the XML Schema for the
http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace namespace (i.e. the xml:
namespace).
The schema itself is available at http://www.w3.org/2001/xml.xsd .
Currently, that schema says that the default value of xml:space is
"preserve". This is inconsistent with the description of xml:space in
Section 2.10 of the XML 1.0 and XML 1.1 Recommendations, which say:
The root element of any document is considered to have
signaled no intentions as regards application space
handling, unless it provides a value for this attribute
or the attribute is declared with a default value.
In particular, XSLT behaves differently when xml:space is present in a
document with the value "preserve" (either explicitly or by inheritance
from a schema), and WXS-aware implementations of XSLT are now becoming
available. Forcing xml:space to be in effect present with a value of
"preserve", except where explicitly specified otherwise, would break
existing expectations.
Therefore, the XML Core WG would like to remove the default value
of xml:space from the XML Schema.
Please send comments to xml-editor@w3.org, which is copied on this
message.
--
"Your worships will perhaps be thinking John Cowan
that it is an easy thing to blow up a dog?
http:/www.reutershealth.com
[Or] to write a book?"
http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
--Don Quixote, Introduction jcowan@reutershealth.com
Received on Tuesday, 7 September 2004 22:24:17 UTC