W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > December 2004

Re: XInclude ready for PUBLICATION as a Rec [was: Minutes for XML Core WG telcon of 2004 December 8]

From: Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 09:48:18 +0100
To: Matthieu Fuzellier <matthieu@w3.org>
Cc: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>, vivien@w3.org, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, webreq@w3.org, w3t-comm@w3.org, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1103186898.2786.46.camel@stratustier>
Hi Matthieu,

Le mer 15/12/2004 ŗ 21:38, Matthieu Fuzellier a ťcrit :
> There is still an issue in the pubrules checker [2] :
> [3] report that the working group is under PP : W3C Patent Policy but
> the document says Current Patent Practice (CPP). 
> I'm not yet familiar with this PP problems... Dom any suggestion?

The checker is indeed wrong on this one; now that IPP can handle CPP
documents for groups under the Patent Policy, the pubrules checker
expects that any spec not listed as CPP in IPP should be under the
Patent Policy. But this is too high an assumption given that not all
groups under the Patent Policy are using IPP to handle their CPP specs. 

If you can't make any sense of the paragraph above, that's OK :)

Paul, if you're interested in moving the CPP specs of XML Core to IPP -
so that the patent disclosures get handled uniformly for all your specs
- please get in touch with me and Ian.



> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xinclude-20041220/
> [2]
> http://www.w3.org/2000/06/webdata/xslt?xslfile=http://www.w3.org/2001/07/pubrules-checker&doc_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fw3.org%2FTR%2F2004%2FREC-xinclude-20041220%2F&auth=no&recursive=1&xmlfile=http%3A%2F%2Fcgi.w3.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Ftidy-if%3FdocAddr%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fw3.org%252FTR%252F2004%252FREC-xinclude-20041220%252F
> [3] http://www.w3.org/Member/Mail/
Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/

Received on Thursday, 16 December 2004 08:48:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:34 UTC