W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > December 2004

RE: XInclude ready for PUBLICATION as a Rec [was: Minutes forXMLCore WG telcon of 2004 December 8]

From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 16:59:03 -0500
Message-ID: <F13E1BF26B19BA40AF3C0DE7D4DA0C03021906E3@ati-mail01.arbortext.local>
To: "Matthieu Fuzellier" <matthieu@w3.org>
Cc: <dom@w3.org>, <vivien@w3.org>, "Philippe Le Hegaret" <plh@w3.org>, <webreq@w3.org>, <w3t-comm@w3.org>, <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthieu Fuzellier [mailto:matthieu@w3.org] 
> Sent: Wednesday, 15 December, 2004 15:55
> To: Paul Grosso
> Cc: dom@w3.org; vivien@w3.org; Philippe Le Hegaret; 
> webreq@w3.org; w3t-comm@w3.org; public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: RE: XInclude ready for PUBLICATION as a Rec [was: 
> Minutes forXMLCore WG telcon of 2004 December 8]
> 
> Hi Paul,
> 
> On Wed, 2004-12-15 at 16:50, Paul Grosso wrote:
> > I don't see any problem here.  The pubrules checker is just
> > not smart enough to handle this case.
> > 
> > The WG is now working under PP; XInclude was beyond the CR stage
> > when the WG went from CPP to PP, so it remains under CPP.
> 
> Yes it probably doesn't manage these cases (yet?)
> 
> > I'm sure Philippe can confirm, as we've discussed this before.
> > 
> > I assume there will be no problem publishing this tomorrow.
> 
> XInclude is planed for 20 Dec, XSL is for tomorrow (and here is no pb
> with it) ;) I supposed you messed up between those two.

Oops!  I sure did confuse them.

Publishing even two docs at the same time is too confusing 
for me--good thing I'm not a webreq person!

thanks,

paul 
Received on Wednesday, 15 December 2004 21:59:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:34 UTC