Re: Agenda for XML Core WG telcon of 2004 August 4

Regrets.

At 11:38 AM 8/2/2004, Paul Grosso wrote:

>We have an XML Core WG phone call scheduled for Wednesday, August 4,
>from
>           08:00-09:00 Pacific time aka
>           11:00-12:00 Eastern time aka
>           15:00-16:00 UTC
>           16:00-17:00 in Ireland and the UK
>           17:00-18:00 in middle (most of) Europe
>on the Zakim W3C Bridge, +1 617 761 6200, passcode 9652#.
>We also use IRC channel #xmlcore on irc.w3.org:6665 .
>
>See the XML Core group page [1] for pointers to current documents
>and other information.  If you have additions to the agenda, please
>email them to the WG list before the start of the telcon.
>
>Please also review our group page's task list [2] for accuracy and
>completeness and be prepared to amend if necessary and accept it
>at the beginning of the call.
>
>Norm, John sent regrets.
>
>Agenda
>======
>1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and the current
>    task status [2] (have any questions, comments, or corrections
>    ready by the beginning of the call).
>
>
>2. Neither Norm nor Paul can make next week's telcon, and Henry is
>    on holidays.  We may cancel the telcon of the 11th.
>
>
>3. Problem with xml:space in the Schema document for the XML namespace
>
>Masayasu Ishikawa <mimasa@w3.org> sent us email on this at:
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Jul/0019
>
>Norm thinks Mimasa is correct; we should not provide a default for
>xml:space.
>Glenn agrees.  Richard agrees.
>
>We should remove the default for xml:space from the schema.
>
>We have CONSENSUS that we should remove the default from xml:space,
>but we'd like to wait until Henry is back to be sure.
>
>ACTION to Henry (when he returns):  Comment and perhaps fix the schema.
>
>
>4. XML errata.  The published 1.0 errata document is [8], the
>    published 1.1 errata document is [9], and the NEW PUBLIC
>    Potential Errata (PE) document is [7].
>
>PE 130 Missing paren in section 5.2 in XML 1.1
>----------------------------------------------
>Editorial.  We should add the missing paren (was in 3rd Ed).
>
>CONSENSUS to do so.
>
>ACTION to Francois:  Put into countdown until August 11.
>
>PE 131 Space or S in XML decl.
>------------------------------
>Commentor says we use Space in the XML decl, but S elsewhere.
>
>Actually, XML decl is (correctly) using S, and S is just the same as in
>XML 1.0.
>
>So the bug is that in SDDecl, it refers to x#20+ instead S:
>http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xml11-20040204/#NT-SDDecl
>
>We had CONSENSUS this was an editorial oversight, and that we should
>change x#20+ to S in the SDDecl production.
>
>ACTION to Francois:  Record the above resolution and put into countdown.
>
>
>5. Namespaces in XML.
>
>   ACTION to Richard:  Produce a draft for NS1.0 2nd Ed.
>
>
>6. Xinclude CR was published April 13 at:
>    http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/CR-xinclude-20040413
>    The updated test suite cover page is at
>    http://www.w3.org/XML/Test/XInclude/
>
>Sandra had sent email with what she thought were the needed corrections
>at:
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Jul/0022
>and she is waiting for confirmation or corrections on that.
>
>Richard and Glenn agree that Sandra should do as outlined in her email.
>
>ACTION to Sandra:  Make the changes and commit to CVS.
>
>The PR-ready draft is at:
>http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/07/PR-xinclude/
>
>The public DoC (aka latest issues list) is at:
>http://www.w3.org/XML/2004/07/ExIT-xinclude/issues.html
>At the top, this document says it's a DoC for the 3rd XInclude CR.
>Are we really at the third CR, or just the second?
>
>Am I reading the DoC correctly to say that we have closed all issues?
>
>Are there any "closed" issues for which we have rebuttal we wish to
>discuss?
>
>In the DoC, I don't understand "Ack" column of the table.  What does
>"review reply unaddressed" mean?
>
>I thought we got some push back from Elliotte that requires that we
>indicate review non-acceptance of our resolution, but I don't see that
>reflected in the DoC.
>
>At http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Jul/0025
>Richard had sent a format for submitting test reports and an XSLT
>to convert the report to an HTML page.  He also included his actual
>results.
>
>We still need implementation feedback from Daniel and Elliotte (and any
>others from who we can).
>
>ACTION to Richard:  Send Elliotte an email on how to present his
>results,
>cc-ing Paul.
>
>ACTION to DV:  Provide a table giving results (using Richard's files) of
>
>running the test suite on your implementation.
>
>ACTION to Paul:  Write a PR request once we are ready to exit CR.
>
>
>7. xml:id.
>
>We should say that the values of xml:id must be
>Names according to the XML version of the document.
>
>ACTION: xml:id editors to update the draft to allow XML 1.0 and XML
>         1.1 Names as appropriate.
>
>We need to get into processing xml:id comments and producing a new
>draft.
>
>ACTION to Daniel:  Work toward producing a new draft.
>
>Norm may have some cycles to work on this after mid-August.
>
>[1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core
>[2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks
>[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Jul/0034
>[7]
>http://www.w3.org/XML/2004/02/proposed-xml10-3e-and-xml11-errata.html
>[8] http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V10-3e-errata
>[9] http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V11-1e-errata
>[12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2004AprJun/0058.html

Sandra I. Martinez
National Institute of Standards and Technology
100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8970,
Gaithersburg, Md. 20899

(301) 975-3579
sandra.martinez@nist.gov

Received on Tuesday, 3 August 2004 17:21:54 UTC