W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xhtml2@w3.org > January 2010

Re: Note Draft

From: Gregory J. Rosmaita <oedipus@hicom.net>
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 22:08:22 +0000
To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, XHTML WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20100109220646.M31183@hicom.net>
aloha, shane!

as a note, i agree that the "issues" should be excised, but they 
should not be lost, but collated into an foo_issues.html file, so
that when and if work is resumed upon the drafts, the issues collected
by the XHTML2 WG are readily available for consultation and guidance,

CONSERVATIVE, n.  A statesman who is enamored of existing evils,
as distinguished from the Liberal, who wishes to replace them 
with others.         -- Ambrose Bierce, _The Devil's Dictionary_
             Gregory J. Rosmaita, oedipus@hicom.net
  Camera Obscura: http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/index.html

---------- Original Message -----------
From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
To: XHTML WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org>
Sent: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 18:52:37 -0600
Subject: Note Draft

> I am preparing the draft Note and I had a thought.  Well,
>  several of them really.  Here's the most important one:  We 
> have historically embedded the 'issues' into the draft.  I think 
> we should remove them from the Note.  There is no ongoing 
> development, so things that were 'contentious' or otherwise 
> subject to later consideration are not ever going to be considered.
> Thoughts?
> -- 
> Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-
> 8160 x120 Managing Director                            Fax: +1 
> 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: 
------- End of Original Message -------
Received on Saturday, 9 January 2010 22:08:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:30:32 UTC