On 7 Jan, Shane McCarron wrote: > As a quick follow up to this - I actually believe that the current RFC > does a decent job of dealing with this. See > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3236.txt section 8. We are not using it, but > that doesn't mean it is wrong. Agreed. It appears quite clear. Why are we raising the issue at this particular time? -- - Tina Holmboe siteSifter Greytower Technologies http://www.sitesifter.co.uk http://www.greytower.net Website Quality and Accessibility TestingReceived on Wednesday, 7 January 2009 17:01:56 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:43:43 GMT