Re: rel=CURIE in RDFa, but rel=URI in Link:

I forgot to comment on one other thing.

On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:35:22 +0200, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>  
wrote:


> 2) The HTTP Link header draft suggests a IANA registry for "short"  
> relation names; the HTML5 spec currently suggests a Wiki (!), and the  
> XHTML2 WG seems to assume it can define these reserved words.

Actually, if you want to compare like with like here, the XHTML2 WG has  
grandfathered in existing defined values, but thinks that extensibility  
should not be via centralised repositories like a registry or a wiki, but  
via URIs, since this is the most scalable way.

Best wishes,

Steven