Re: XHTML-Role ready for pre-last call review

Greetings Shane, I have a few comments that are editorial in nature.

Nothing to explain what Orange background signifies.

non-qualified vs unqualified, non-qualified not in namespaces or Curies 
specs.

3. The XHTML Role Attribute
[1] 
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2008/ED-xhtml-role-20080128/#s_role_module_attributes
  defines standards roles

3.1. Extending the collection of roles
  talks about extending the set of roles

How about :
  3. The XHTML Role Attribute
    describe the attribute
  3.1. predefined roles
    banner, etc
  3.2. Extending the collection of roles
    asis

Why are XHTML role attribute values described with "Example definitions 
include the RDF/OWL Taxonomy for the XHTML role attribute values in 
Appendix C, "? Should we not do what we claim to be current best practice, 
i.e. "that the URI associated with that vocabulary resolve to a resource 
that allows for the discovery of the definition of the roles in the 
vocabulary."?

Since we have reached the milestone of Last Call should we not complete 
Section E. Acknowledgments?

Regards, Roland
FBCS, CITP
IBM Software Group, Strategy, Software Standards



Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> 
Sent by: public-xhtml2-request@w3.org
06/02/2008 14:34

To
XHTML WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org>
cc

Subject
XHTML-Role ready for pre-last call review







As per my action, please review the current draft of XHTML Role with an 
eye toward approving its publication for a second last call period.

http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2008/ED-xhtml-role-20080128/

This review should be completed no later than 12 February.

-- 
Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com










Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU