W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xhtml2@w3.org > May 2007

Re: Editorial Proposal: let's use XHTML 1.1

From: Alexander Graf <alexander.graf@deri.org>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 18:59:09 +0200
Message-Id: <1D900303-D46F-47D6-8C14-07ACE106B339@deri.org>
Cc: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, XHTML WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org>, public-xhtml2-request@w3.org
To: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
I'm using XHTML1.1 for almost all documents and haven't found any  
problems with common browsers.


- Alex

On 07.05.2007, at 16:25, Richard Schwerdtfeger wrote:

> Can Opera and Safari render it? I loaned out my Mac recently.
>
>
> Rich Schwerdtfeger
> Distinguished Engineer, SWG Accessibility Architect/Strategist
> Chair, IBM Accessibility Architecture Review Board
> blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/schwer
> <graycol.gif>
> Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
>
>
> Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
> Sent by: public-xhtml2-request@w3.org
> 05/06/2007 09:50 AM
>
> <ecblank.gif>
>
> To
> <ecblank.gif>
>
> XHTML WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org>
> <ecblank.gif>
>
> cc
> <ecblank.gif>
>
> <ecblank.gif>
>
> Subject
> <ecblank.gif>
>
> Editorial Proposal: let's use XHTML 1.1
> <ecblank.gif>
> <ecblank.gif>
>
>
> We have been releasing all of our specs in XHTML 1.0 strict for years
> now.  I propose that we change to using xhtml 1.1 from now on... XHTML
> 1.1 has been out for years, we know how to present the content so it
> will render fine in modern, popular browsers.  Can anyone think of a
> downside?
>
> -- 
> Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
> Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
> ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com
>
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 7 May 2007 16:59:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 February 2010 18:12:46 GMT