W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xhtml2@w3.org > May 2007

Re: Editorial Proposal: let's use XHTML 1.1

From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2007 09:35:26 -0500
Message-ID: <463F392E.8040107@aptest.com>
To: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
CC: XHTML WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org>, public-xhtml2-request@w3.org

Yes, Opera and Safari both appear to process XHTML 1.1 documents just fine.

Richard Schwerdtfeger wrote:
>
> Can Opera and Safari render it? I loaned out my Mac recently.
>
>
> Rich Schwerdtfeger
> Distinguished Engineer, SWG Accessibility Architect/Strategist
> Chair, IBM Accessibility Architecture Review Board
> blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/schwer
> Inactive hide details for Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>Shane 
> McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
>
>
>                         *Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>*
>                         Sent by: public-xhtml2-request@w3.org
>
>                         05/06/2007 09:50 AM
>
> 	
>
> To
> 	
> XHTML WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org>
>
> cc
> 	
>
> Subject
> 	
> Editorial Proposal: let's use XHTML 1.1
>
> 	
>
>
>
> We have been releasing all of our specs in XHTML 1.0 strict for years
> now.  I propose that we change to using xhtml 1.1 from now on... XHTML
> 1.1 has been out for years, we know how to present the content so it
> will render fine in modern, popular browsers.  Can anyone think of a
> downside?
>
> -- 
> Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
> Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
> ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com
>
>
>
>

-- 
Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Monday, 7 May 2007 14:35:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 February 2010 18:12:46 GMT