Laurens Holst wrote: > Personally I am fine with XHTML2 and XHTML5 both keeping their names; > after all, IPv5 was also something quite different from IPv6. > Nevertheless, if a name change is needed to avoid confusion, I think > it should rather be XHTML2 that would have to change its name, being > the specification that diverges from XHTML 1 quite significantly, it > is largely incompatible, and even using a different namespace. Just to clarify; we do not believe that XHTML2 is terribly different from XHTML 1.1. And it does not use a different namespace. -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.comReceived on Friday, 15 June 2007 16:19:34 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 February 2010 18:12:46 GMT