- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:13:42 -0400
- To: public-xg-webid@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4EAEF366.3030107@openlinksw.com>
On 10/31/11 2:42 PM, Henry Story wrote: > I think we also felt that perhaps we should call our spec the WebID TLS spec, so that it does not look like we are trying to own identity on the web. It's really the WebID verification protocol spec. It uses WebIDs to enhance TLS. This spec needs a conceptual section distinct from implementation details. Then we open up the flood gates so to speak, since those that don't like RDF (for instance) see the conceptual framework instead of an attempt to route people to RDF etc.. This is about apolitical architecture. URIs are a living example of apolitical architecture in action :-) -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Monday, 31 October 2011 19:14:14 UTC