W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-webid@w3.org > November 2011

Re: Normative vs Informative

From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 03:14:56 +0100
Cc: Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>, "public-xg-webid@w3.org XG" <public-xg-webid@w3.org>
Message-Id: <25372113-850D-4AF6-8C6D-5E3DB2D5572E@bblfish.net>
To: Dominik Tomaszuk <ddooss@wp.pl>

On 26 Nov 2011, at 22:19, Dominik Tomaszuk wrote:

> Hi Stéphane,
> 
> On 26.11.2011 20:01, Stéphane Corlosquet wrote:
>> re serialization, I'm not sure where to draw the line. It should be a
>> mix of W3 spec status and existing deployment. Here is the list of
>> formats besides RDFa RDF/XML:
>> - microdata
>> - microformats-2
>> - Turtle
>> - N3
>> - JSON-LD
> - TriG/N-Quads
> - RDF/JSON
> - ...
> 
>> I'm not sure the core WebID spec needs to include all the possible
>> formats, maybe these should go into a separate document like a WebID
>> primer. The core spec could include RDFa and RDF/XML, or maybe none at
>> all, just the RDF graph expressed in Turtle maybe, to avoid making
>> anyone jealous.
> +1

Great idea. Let's start with a wiki. 
Open one page: Formats, and have it point to an example page in every other format
you can think of - so that each format can get the attention it deserves.

Here I wrote up the initial page:

   http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/wiki/Formats

Henry


> 
> Dominik

Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/
Received on Sunday, 27 November 2011 02:15:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 27 November 2011 02:15:29 GMT