- From: Mo McRoberts <mo.mcroberts@bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 19:31:50 +0000
- To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Cc: Peter Williams <home_pw@msn.com>, public-xg-webid@w3.org
On 23 Nov 2011, at 19:05, Henry Story wrote:
>
> On 23 Nov 2011, at 20:00, Mo McRoberts wrote:
>
>>
>> On 23 Nov 2011, at 18:42, Peter Williams wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Stop calling a "cert" ontology too, since it precious little to do with certificates - as anyone understands the term. The bindings are not signed, and in RDF land show no sign of being signed in the next decade.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> People have enough trouble understanding the difference between certificates and keys as it is.
>
> Mh it's a cert ontology because
> - we will be able to use it to describe certificates.
Okay… is the plan to, over time, add the properties and classes which allow description of an entire certificate?
_:cert a cert:Certificate ;
cert:subject "CN=example.com,C=GB"^^cert:DistinguishedName ;
cert:issuer "CN=Joe Bloggs,O=Widgets PTY,C=AU"^^cert:DistinguishedName ;
cert:notBefore "2010-01-05T00:00:00Z"^^xsd:dateTime ;
cert:notAfter "2012-01-04T23:59:59Z"^^xsd:dateTime ;
cert:subjectKey _:key ;
cert:extension _:basicConstraints ;
cert:extension _:subjectAltName .
_:key a cert:rsaPublicKey ;
... .
_:basicConstraints a cert:Extension ;
cert:extension <oid:2.5.29.19> ;
ext:CA "false"^^xsd:boolean .
_:subjectAltName a cert:Extension ;
cert:extension <oid:2.5.29.17> ;
ext:URI <http://example.com/me#id> ;
ext:IP "169.254.0.1" .
?
[I won't get into the thorny issue of comparison between RDF graphs and canonical DER form, comparing signatures, etc., etc...]
M.
--
Mo McRoberts - Technical Lead - The Space,
0141 422 6036 (Internal: 01-26036) - PGP key CEBCF03E,
Project Office: Room 7083, BBC Television Centre, London W12 7RJ
Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2011 19:32:17 UTC