Re: [foaf-protocols] cert:fingerprint ?

On 11/22/11 12:30 PM, Dan Brickley wrote:
> On 25 October 2011 20:53, Kingsley Idehen<kidehen@openlinksw.com>  wrote:
>> On 10/25/11 12:38 PM, Henry Story wrote:
>>> On 25 Oct 2011, at 18:33, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>>>
>>>> Henry,
>>>>
>>>> Since we have cert:key, what about cert:fingerprint?
>>> How would you define it?
>> Good question since WOT [1] and these newer Key oriented ontologies aren't
>> aligned. In addition, WOT is conflating public key and x.509 certificate.
> WOT is under-documented, and any progression path will be via merging
> things into FOAF or these other vocabs. But I don't believe it
> conflates; rather we only handled the PGP use case, didn't get into
> x.509 at all.
>
> Dan
>
>
Dan,

I've moved past the issue of conflation etc.. I am already able to 
achieve what I seek [1][2] etc.. What we've implemented in our own 
namespace is there for adoption if anyone so chooses. As stated in an 
earlier Tweet/G+ post [3], extending schemas without consensus inertia 
is yet another Linked Data virtue :-)

My focus remains getting WebID to go viral via Web 2.0 realm player 
participation and adoption.

Links:

1. http://id.myopenlink.net/certgen -- x.509 certificate generator that 
enables Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook, AtomPub blogs (e.g., Wordpress) act 
as IdP spaces for WebID
2. http://goo.gl/AcYWQ -- howto guide re. the above
3. http://goo.gl/vxjc8 -- readable page that also shows why I made my 
"conflation" claim re. PGP public key and x.509 Cert. modeling in WOT .


-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
President&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen